<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comment Spamtrap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seengee.co.uk/comment-spamtrap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seengee.co.uk</link>
	<description>web development blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 03:46:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: seengee</title>
		<link>http://www.seengee.co.uk/comment-spamtrap/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>seengee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seengee.co.uk/?page_id=63#comment-116</guid>
		<description>@dwasifar sorry to hear its not working for you. Out of interest, what charset are  you using on your site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dwasifar sorry to hear its not working for you. Out of interest, what charset are  you using on your site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dwasifar</title>
		<link>http://www.seengee.co.uk/comment-spamtrap/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>dwasifar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seengee.co.uk/?page_id=63#comment-115</guid>
		<description>I had the same problem as WS (though I plan to be nicer about it).  :)  All comments, including my own, wound up in the spam folder.

As a temporary workaround, I removed the &quot;thanks&quot; variable check from the CheckSpamTrap function, leaving this: if (!empty($_POST[$this-&gt;sitevar.&#039;_var_sorry&#039;]) != &#039;&#039;) { $isspam = &#039;spam&#039;; }

This allows real humans to post comments without false positives.  I will watch it over the next few days and see if it also lets spambots through.

Could this be a characterset issue, causing &quot;thanks&quot; in the variable to not match the hardcoded constant?  Just guessing; php is not my forte.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the same problem as WS (though I plan to be nicer about it).  <img src='http://www.seengee.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   All comments, including my own, wound up in the spam folder.</p>
<p>As a temporary workaround, I removed the &#8220;thanks&#8221; variable check from the CheckSpamTrap function, leaving this: if (!empty($_POST[$this->sitevar.'_var_sorry']) != &#8221;) { $isspam = &#8217;spam&#8217;; }</p>
<p>This allows real humans to post comments without false positives.  I will watch it over the next few days and see if it also lets spambots through.</p>
<p>Could this be a characterset issue, causing &#8220;thanks&#8221; in the variable to not match the hardcoded constant?  Just guessing; php is not my forte.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pigster</title>
		<link>http://www.seengee.co.uk/comment-spamtrap/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Pigster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seengee.co.uk/?page_id=63#comment-113</guid>
		<description>Oh and &#039;Thank You!&#039;.

Every little helps, as they say.

Much appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and &#8216;Thank You!&#8217;.</p>
<p>Every little helps, as they say.</p>
<p>Much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pigster</title>
		<link>http://www.seengee.co.uk/comment-spamtrap/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Pigster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seengee.co.uk/?page_id=63#comment-112</guid>
		<description>It appears to be working fine for me.  No problems at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears to be working fine for me.  No problems at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seengee</title>
		<link>http://www.seengee.co.uk/comment-spamtrap/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>seengee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seengee.co.uk/?page_id=63#comment-110</guid>
		<description>@WS it certainly doesn&#039;t mark everything as spam in all circumstances as your comment has come through fine. I&#039;ve sent you an email :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@WS it certainly doesn&#8217;t mark everything as spam in all circumstances as your comment has come through fine. I&#8217;ve sent you an email <img src='http://www.seengee.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WS</title>
		<link>http://www.seengee.co.uk/comment-spamtrap/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>WS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seengee.co.uk/?page_id=63#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Your plugin marks everything as spam, even though I&#039;m logged into my own blog. I like this method of spam prevention, but this plugin clearly needs a lot of work before its usable.

Dealing with spam is one thing, but I never want it to even remotely interfere with legit people posting. I&#039;d rather turn off all spam measures before giving anyone of my readers even the smallest problem posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your plugin marks everything as spam, even though I&#8217;m logged into my own blog. I like this method of spam prevention, but this plugin clearly needs a lot of work before its usable.</p>
<p>Dealing with spam is one thing, but I never want it to even remotely interfere with legit people posting. I&#8217;d rather turn off all spam measures before giving anyone of my readers even the smallest problem posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seengee</title>
		<link>http://www.seengee.co.uk/comment-spamtrap/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>seengee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seengee.co.uk/?page_id=63#comment-108</guid>
		<description>thanks for checking out the plugin. It seems my previous method for hiding these fields will not be compatible with all themes so i have now updated this. An update should be available very soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for checking out the plugin. It seems my previous method for hiding these fields will not be compatible with all themes so i have now updated this. An update should be available very soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.seengee.co.uk/comment-spamtrap/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 05:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seengee.co.uk/?page_id=63#comment-107</guid>
		<description>About Comment Spamtrap -
Installed to Wordpress 291. I see you&#039;re using it here, but correct me if I&#039;m wrong. The description says the 2 fields are &#039;hidden from browsers by CSS&#039; which tells me a human can&#039;t visually see the 2 fields on the page - but like here - I do see them. With people being people somebody will try to type in the fields anyway. I can see it now: They see &#039;thanks&#039; and decide to sign their name there instead. An honest mistake that causes their bonifide comment to be treated as spam. I changed the word &#039;thanks&#039; to &#039;do NOT type in these 2 boxes&#039;. At least this warns people (not bots) to not type in the boxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About Comment Spamtrap -<br />
Installed to Wordpress 291. I see you&#8217;re using it here, but correct me if I&#8217;m wrong. The description says the 2 fields are &#8216;hidden from browsers by CSS&#8217; which tells me a human can&#8217;t visually see the 2 fields on the page &#8211; but like here &#8211; I do see them. With people being people somebody will try to type in the fields anyway. I can see it now: They see &#8216;thanks&#8217; and decide to sign their name there instead. An honest mistake that causes their bonifide comment to be treated as spam. I changed the word &#8216;thanks&#8217; to &#8216;do NOT type in these 2 boxes&#8217;. At least this warns people (not bots) to not type in the boxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
